Garland Lee Mitchell v. Frances May Starns-Williams
Garland Lee Mitchell v. Frances May Starns-Williams
Opinion
54 F.3d 773
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Garland Lee MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Frances May STARNS-WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 95-1181.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 22, 1995.
Garland Lee Mitchell, appellant pro se.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mitchell v. Starns-Williams, No. CA-94-934 (E.D. Va. Dec. 29, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.