Angelo Bob Rooks v. Edward W. Murray
Angelo Bob Rooks v. Edward W. Murray
Opinion
54 F.3d 774
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Angelo Bob ROOKS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 94-6315.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 20, 1995.
Decided: May 16, 1995.
Angelo Bob Rooks, Appellant Pro Se.
Katherine P. Baldwin, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.* Rooks v. Murray, No. CA-93-23 (E.D. Va. Feb. 24, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
We deny Appellant's "Motion for Removal."
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.