Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

Arthur Lee Gooden, II v. Mr. Ponton Sergeant Terry Captain Booker Ms. Scott Mr. Smith Mr. Cei John B. Taylor L.W. Huffman

Arthur Lee Gooden, II v. Mr. Ponton Sergeant Terry Captain Booker Ms. Scott Mr. Smith Mr. Cei John B. Taylor L.W. Huffman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 26, 1995
56 F.3d 61; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19090; 1995 WL 318754 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Arthur Lee Gooden, II v. Mr. Ponton Sergeant Terry Captain Booker Ms. Scott Mr. Smith Mr. Cei John B. Taylor L.W. Huffman

Opinion

56 F.3d 61
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Arthur Lee GOODEN, II, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Mr. PONTON; Sergeant Terry; Captain Booker; Ms. Scott;
Mr. Smith; Mr. Cei; John B. Taylor; L.W.
Huffman, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6240.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 26, 1995.

Arthur Lee Gooden, II, appellant pro se.

Pamela Anne Sargent, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, for appellees.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gooden v. Ponton, No. CA-95-45-R (W.D.Va. Jan. 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑