Sloan v. Hughes
Sloan v. Hughes
Opinion
56 F.3d 62
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ismail SLOAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William HUGHES; Daniel T. Mahon; Thomas F. Neumayer;
Larry W. Huffman; Edward W. Murray; Clarence L. Jackson,
Jr.; John A. Brown; Jacqueline F. Fraser; Gail Y. Browne;
Lewis W. Hurst, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-6175.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 25, 1995.
Ismail Sloan, appellant pro se. Mary Elizabeth Shea, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellees.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration of the order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sloan v. Hughes, No. CA-94-114 (W.D.Va. Jan. 17, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.