Tom Eastman v. Bill Coffey, Sheriff of Spartanburg County Tom Smith, Detective Richard Gregory, Detective Steven Denton, Detective
Tom Eastman v. Bill Coffey, Sheriff of Spartanburg County Tom Smith, Detective Richard Gregory, Detective Steven Denton, Detective
Opinion
57 F.3d 1065
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Tom EASTMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Bill COFFEY, Sheriff of Spartanburg County; Tom Smith,
Detective; Richard Gregory, Detective; Steven
Denton, Detective, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-2270.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 13, 1995.
Tom Eastman, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Keith Wray, II, Gibbes & Clarkson, P.A., Greenville, SC, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint and his motion for reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Eastman v. Coffey, No. CA-93-58 (D.S.C. Mar. 9 and Aug. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.