Todd Andrew Tomko v. Ray Warren French J. Lackey Jane Doe
Todd Andrew Tomko v. Ray Warren French J. Lackey Jane Doe
Opinion
57 F.3d 1067
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Todd Andrew TOMKO, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ray WARREN; French J. Lackey; Jane Doe, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-7186.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 16, 1995.
Todd Andrew Tomko, Appellant Pro Se.
W.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tomko v. Warren, No. CA-94-43-5-V (W.D.N.C. Sept. 20, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.