Clay v. State of S.C.
Clay v. State of S.C.
Opinion
59 F.3d 165
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
LEONARD Clay, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
STATE of South Carolina; South Carolina Department of
Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services;
Commissioner, South Carolina Department
of Probation, Parole and
Pardon Services,
Defendants-
-Appellees.
No. 95-6200.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 22, 1995.
Leonard Clay, Appellant Pro Se. Edwin Eugene Evans, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina; Carl Norman Lundberg, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE & PARDON SERVICE, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Clay v. State of South Carolina, No. CA-94-964 (D.S.C. Jan. 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.