U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

Daniel v. F. Bloom v. Willard C. Smith, Former Major, and Virginia Beach Correctional Center Frank Drew, Sheriff

Daniel v. F. Bloom v. Willard C. Smith, Former Major, and Virginia Beach Correctional Center Frank Drew, Sheriff
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 22, 1995
59 F.3d 165; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23228; 1995 WL 370426 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Daniel v. F. Bloom v. Willard C. Smith, Former Major, and Virginia Beach Correctional Center Frank Drew, Sheriff

Opinion

59 F.3d 165
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Daniel
V.
F. BLOOM, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Willard C. SMITH, Former Major, Defendant--Appellee,
and
Virginia Beach Correctional Center; Frank Drew, Sheriff, Defendants.

No. 95-6196.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 22, 1995.

Daniel V.F. Bloom, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Douglas Stiles, WILLCOX & SAVAGE, Norfolk, VA, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bloom v. Smith, No. CA-92-114-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 26, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.