Thomas J. Conboy v. Mary Alice Kelly
Thomas J. Conboy v. Mary Alice Kelly
Opinion
59 F.3d 166
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Thomas J. CONBOY, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Mary Alice KELLY, Defendant--Appellee.
No. 95-1351.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 20, 1995.
Thomas J. Conboy, Appellant Pro Se. James Patrick Gillece, Jr., MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, Baltimore, MD; James F. Horne, BOYCE, HORNE & JONES, L.C., St. Louis, MO, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his amended complaint on the basis of improper venue. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Conboy v. Kelly, No. CA-93-4148-B (D. Md. Feb. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.