James E. McDowell v. City of Huntington, West Virginia, and Fairfield West Community, Incorporated
James E. McDowell v. City of Huntington, West Virginia, and Fairfield West Community, Incorporated
Opinion
59 F.3d 167
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James E. McDOWELL, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
CITY OF HUNTINGTON, West Virginia, Defendant--Appellee,
and
Fairfield West Community, Incorporated, Defendant.
No. 95-1695.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 20, 1995.
James E. McDowell, Appellant Pro Se. John Earl Jenkins, Jr., JENKINS, FENSTERMAKER, KRIEGER, KAYES & FARRELL, Huntington, West VA, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing this action as time-barred. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McDowell v. City of Huntington, No. CA-94-353-3 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 15, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.