U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

James T. Miller v. Sandra L. Combs Winnie R. Dixon Joseph F. Lewis John B. Metzger, III Linda R. Pitman

James T. Miller v. Sandra L. Combs Winnie R. Dixon Joseph F. Lewis John B. Metzger, III Linda R. Pitman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 23, 1995
59 F.3d 167; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23456; 1995 WL 373152 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

James T. Miller v. Sandra L. Combs Winnie R. Dixon Joseph F. Lewis John B. Metzger, III Linda R. Pitman

Opinion

59 F.3d 167
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

James T. MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Sandra L. COMBS; Winnie R. Dixon; Joseph F. Lewis; John
B. Metzger, III; Linda R. Pitman, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6225.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 23, 1995.

James T. Miller, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Miller v. Combs, No. CA-94-1468 (E.D. Va. Dec. 9, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.