Charles T. Sherwin v. United States of America Donald L. Robinson, and State of North Carolina
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Sherwin v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 1999)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
59 F.3d 167
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Charles T. SHERWIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America; Donald L. Robinson, Defendants-Appellees,
and
STATE of North Carolina, Defendant.
No. 94-2632.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 31, 1995.
Decided: June 23, 1995.
Charles T. Sherwin, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Edwin Hamilton, III, Office of The United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders dismissing his civil action on res judicata grounds, imposing a prefiling injunction, and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend that judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sherwin v. United States, No. CA-94-48-3-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 11 & 17, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.