Anthony Ojo v. John T. Hadden Jim Brand George Kearney
Anthony Ojo v. John T. Hadden Jim Brand George Kearney
Opinion
59 F.3d 167
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
ANTHONY OJO, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
John T. HADDEN; Jim Brand; George Kearney, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-6220.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 23, 1995.
Anthony Ojo, Appellant Pro Se. Linda Kay Teal, Office of The United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his Bivens complaint.* We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ojo v. Hadden, No. CA-93-754-H (E.D.N.C. Nov. 9, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Defendants of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.