United States v. Trevor Grant, A/K/A Roy Arrindell
United States v. Trevor Grant, A/K/A Roy Arrindell
Opinion
59 F.3d 168
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Trevor GRANT, a/k/a Roy Arrindell, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 95-6275.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 26, 1995.
Trevor Grant, appellant pro se. Kevin Michael Comstock, Office of the United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Grant, Nos. CR-92-159; CA-95-46-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We also deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.