U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

United States v. Perry Wayne Frado

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 26, 1995

59 F.3d 168; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23187; 1995 WL 375917 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

59 F.3d 168
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Perry Wayne FRADO, Defendant--Appellant.

No. 95-6304.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 26, 1995.

Perry W. Frado, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Frado, Nos. CR-88-81-B; CA-94-1072-B (D. Md. Jan. 23, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.