U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

United States v. Sandra Thornal

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 20, 1995

59 F.3d 168; 1995 WL 370699 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

59 F.3d 168
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Sandra THORNAL, Defendant--Appellant.

No. 95-6008.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995
Decided: June 20, 1995

Sandra Thornal, Appellant Pro Se. J. Brady Hair, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, SC, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, C.J., and BUTZNER, Sr. C.J.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying her 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Thornal, Nos. CR-92-253; CA-93-2584-2-18AJ (D.S.C. Nov. 23, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.