Gregory Alonza Wright v. S. Hunter Howard, Jr. South Carolina Tax Commission
Gregory Alonza Wright v. S. Hunter Howard, Jr. South Carolina Tax Commission
Opinion
59 F.3d 169
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Gregory Alonza WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
S. Hunter HOWARD, Jr.; South Carolina Tax Commission,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-1026.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 20, 1995.
Gregory Alonza Wright, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation, and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wright v. Howard, No. CA-94-3120-3-17-B (D.S.C. Dec. 9, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.