Daniel L. Davis v. Edward W. Murray Pamela Anne Sargent Unknown
Daniel L. Davis v. Edward W. Murray Pamela Anne Sargent Unknown
Opinion
60 F.3d 821
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Daniel L. DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY; Pamela Anne Sargent; Unknown Defendants,
Defendants--Appellees.
No. 95-6548.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 29, 1995.
Daniel L. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Davis v. Murray, No. CA-94-310-R (W.D.Va. Mar. 17, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.