U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

Anthony Edwin Hurley v. Municipality of Prince George's County County Executive, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, in Their Official Capacities Only

Anthony Edwin Hurley v. Municipality of Prince George's County County Executive, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, in Their Official Capacities Only
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 13, 1995
60 F.3d 822; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24874; 1995 WL 419290 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Anthony Edwin Hurley v. Municipality of Prince George's County County Executive, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, in Their Official Capacities Only

Opinion

60 F.3d 822
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Anthony Edwin HURLEY, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
MUNICIPALITY OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY; County Executive,
Upper Marlboro, Maryland, in their official
capacities only, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6544.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 22, 1995.
Decided July 13, 1995.

Anthony Edwin Hurley, appellant Pro Se.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hurley v. Municipality of Prince George's County, No. CA-95-686-PJM (D.Md. Mar. 23, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.