U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

James Earl Holston v. Fred H. Moody R. David Henderson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 7, 1995

60 F.3d 822; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 26154; 1995 WL 419079 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

60 F.3d 822
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

James Earl HOLSTON, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Fred H. MOODY; R. David Henderson, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6357.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 22, 1995.
Decided: July 7, 1995.

James Earl Holston, appellant pro se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Holston v. Moody, No. CA-94-696-5-F (E.D.N.C. Jan. 27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.