United States v. Oscar Ellis, Jr.
United States v. Oscar Ellis, Jr.
Opinion
60 F.3d 825
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Oscar ELLIS, Jr., Defendant--Appellant.
No. 95-6140.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 22, 1995.
Decided July 11, 1995.
Oscar Ellis, Jr., appellant pro se. Mary Ann Snow, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ellis, Nos. CR-92-114; CA-94-1142 (E.D. Va. Jan. 3, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel because the appeal presents no complex issues. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.