Todd v. South Carolina Dept. of Corrections Compliance Office at Headquarters
Todd v. South Carolina Dept. of Corrections Compliance Office at Headquarters
Opinion
60 F.3d 825
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Johnnie W. TODD, a/k/a Christopher S. Kollyns, a/k/a John W.
Todd, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS COMPLIANCE OFFICE
AT HEADQUARTERS; T. Travis Medlock, Attorney
General of the State of South Carolina,
Respondents-Appellees.
No. 94-6364.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 13, 1995.
Decided July 11, 1995.
Johnnie W. Todd, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, SC, for Appellees.
D.S.C.
DISMISSED.
Before WILKINSON, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Todd v. South Carolina Dep't of Corrections Compliance Office at Headquarters, No. CA-93-1127-3-17-B (D.S.C. Mar. 11, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.