U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

United States v. Jose Jesus Nuesslein, A/K/A Jose Jesus Mora

United States v. Jose Jesus Nuesslein, A/K/A Jose Jesus Mora
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 13, 1995
60 F.3d 826; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24929; 1995 WL 419955 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. Jose Jesus Nuesslein, A/K/A Jose Jesus Mora

Opinion

60 F.3d 826
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Jose Jesus NUESSLEIN, a/k/a Jose Jesus Mora, Defendant--Appellant.

No. 95-6488.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 22, 1995.
Decided: July 13, 1995.

Jose Jesus Nuesslein, appellant pro se. Janet S. Reincke, Office of the U.S. Atty., Norfolk, VA, for appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Nuesslein, Nos. CR-94-29; CA-95-16 (E.D.Va. Mar. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

*

We also deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.