Bernard Ray Richardson v. Glen E. Conrad, Judge
Bernard Ray Richardson v. Glen E. Conrad, Judge
Opinion
61 F.3d 900
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Bernard Ray RICHARDSON, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Glen E. CONRAD, Judge, Defendant--Appellee.
No. 95-6684.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 22, 1995.
Decided: July 18, 1995.
Bernard Ray Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Richardson v. Conrad, No. CA-95-370-R (W.D.Va. Apr. 20, 1995).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
In light of this disposition, Appellant's motion to appoint counsel is hereby denied
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.