McCray v. Garbis
McCray v. Garbis
Opinion
61 F.3d 900
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Milton MCCRAY, Plaintiff--Appellant,
and
The McCray Family, Plaintiff,
v.
M.J. GARBIS, Judge; A.D. Eason, Assistant Attorney General;
Rosenblatt, Assistant Attorney General; R. Kastendier,
Assistant Attorney General; Clerk, United States District
Court For Maryland, Individually And professionally,
Defendants--Appellees.
No. 95-6688.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 22, 1995
Decided: July 18, 1995
Milton McCray, Appellant Pro Se.
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider the court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McCray v. Garbis, No. CA-95-248-PJM (D.Md. Apr. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.