United States v. Michael Howze
United States v. Michael Howze
Opinion
61 F.3d 901
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Michael HOWZE, Defendant--Appellant.
No. 95-6628.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 22, 1995.
Decided July 18, 1995.
Michael Howze, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Asst. U.S. Atty., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. Sec. 3582(c)(2) (West Supp. 1995). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Howze, No. CR-94-1 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.