David Albert Simms v. Edward W. Murray
David Albert Simms v. Edward W. Murray
Opinion
62 F.3d 1415
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
David Albert SIMMS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 95-6157.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 25, 1995.
Decided: Aug. 10, 1995.
David Albert Simms, Appellant Pro Se.
Thomas Cauthorne Daniel, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Simms v. Murray, No. CA-93-1091-AM (E.D.Va. Jan. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.