Earl McVay v. Dean Fullard
Earl McVay v. Dean Fullard
Opinion
62 F.3d 1415
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Earl MCVAY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Dean FULLARD, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 94-7505.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Aug. 10, 1995.
Submitted: July 25, 1995
Decided: August 10, 1995
Earl McVay, Appellant Pro Se.
Joseph Parker McLean, Clarke, Johnson & Peterson, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his "Motion of Discovery." We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McVay v. Fullard, No. CA-94-665-4-17-AK (D.S.C. Nov. 28, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.