Frank M. Gaster v. The State-Record Company, Inc. Frank M. McComas Publisher Thomas N. McLean Editor John Does
Frank M. Gaster v. The State-Record Company, Inc. Frank M. McComas Publisher Thomas N. McLean Editor John Does
Opinion
64 F.3d 656
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Frank M. GASTER, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
The STATE-RECORD COMPANY, INC.; Frank M. McComas,
Publisher; Thomas N. McLean, Editor; John Does,
Defendants--Appellees.
No. 95-1706.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 27, 1995.
Decided: August 15, 1995.
Frank M. Gaster, appellant pro se.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gaster v. State-Record Company, Inc., No. CA-94-1796-3-20AJ (D.S.C. Feb. 27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.