Freddy Sylvestor Campbell v. Mercer County Circuit Court
Freddy Sylvestor Campbell v. Mercer County Circuit Court
Opinion
64 F.3d 656
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Freddy Sylvestor CAMPBELL, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
MERCER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, Defendant--Appellee.
No. 95-1259.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 27, 1995.
Decided Aug. 15, 1995.
Freddy Sylvestor Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Charles R. Smith, OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, Princeton, WV, for Appellee.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus as moot. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Campbell v. Mercer County Circuit Court, No. CA-94-181 (S.D.W.Va. Jan. 3, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.