Richard Kenneth Cox v. John B. Taylor, Warden Lou Dixon Marsha Altizer
Richard Kenneth Cox v. John B. Taylor, Warden Lou Dixon Marsha Altizer
Opinion
64 F.3d 656
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Richard Kenneth COX, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
John B. TAYLOR, Warden; Lou Dixon; Marsha Altizer,
Defendants--Appellees.
No. 95-6737.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 25, 1995.
Decided Aug. 14, 1995.
Richard Kenneth Cox, appellant pro se.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cox v. Taylor, No. CA-95-382-R (W.D.Va. Apr. 24, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.