U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

Vernell A. Jeffries v. Richard A. Lanham, Sr. Joseph Henneberry, Director of Patuxent Institution

Vernell A. Jeffries v. Richard A. Lanham, Sr. Joseph Henneberry, Director of Patuxent Institution
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 11, 1995
64 F.3d 657; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 29918; 1995 WL 473868 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Vernell A. Jeffries v. Richard A. Lanham, Sr. Joseph Henneberry, Director of Patuxent Institution

Opinion

64 F.3d 657

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Vernell A. JEFFRIES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Richard A. LANHAM, Sr.; Joseph Henneberry, Director of
Patuxent Institution, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6573.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 25, 1995.
Decided Aug. 11, 1995.

Vernell A. Jeffries, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Baltimore, MD; Leo Wesley Ottey, Jr., BALTIMORE CITY DEPARTMENT OF LAW, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jeffries v. Lanham, No. CA-94-2729-HAR (D.Md. Apr. 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.