U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

Lee v. State of N.C.

Lee v. State of N.C.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 11, 1995
64 F.3d 657; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 29916; 1995 WL 473952 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Lee v. State of N.C.

Opinion

64 F.3d 657

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Gregory Maurice LEE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; Doctor Tolson; Dr. Davenport;
Jack Webb; Mrs. Wombaugh; Sergeant Witherspoon; Don
Wright; Franklin E. Freeman, JR.; W.V. Ritchie; Ed
McMichael, Jr.; Jack Holtzman; Ronald Jones; J.J. Clark;
Unknown Surgeons; Unknown Nurses; Nathan Rice; Doctor
Anderson; C. Barrow; Officer Williams; Officer Ingram,
Randall Lee; Nurse Bradley; Anne Emery, Nurse; Roger L.
Dillard; Robert W. Fisher; Ricky Robinson; Mr.
McWilliams; Ernest Smith, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6551.

Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 25, 1995.
Decided Aug. 11, 1995.

Gregory Maurice Lee, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lee v. North Carolina, No. CA-94-561-5-CT-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 21, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.