Anthony Perron Price v. Pete Clary
Anthony Perron Price v. Pete Clary
Opinion
64 F.3d 658
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Anthony Perron PRICE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Pete CLARY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 95-6843.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 25, 1995.
Decided Aug. 14, 1995.
Anthony Perron Price, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Price v. Clary, No. CA-94-683-6 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 31, 1995). Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.