U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

Nathaniel Morgan v. George Padgett, Betty Cummings, Donald R. McTaggart John L. Reid, and Don Neal, in Their Individual Capacities

Nathaniel Morgan v. George Padgett, Betty Cummings, Donald R. McTaggart John L. Reid, and Don Neal, in Their Individual Capacities
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 22, 1995
64 F.3d 658; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 29926; 1995 WL 496828 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Nathaniel Morgan v. George Padgett, Betty Cummings, Donald R. McTaggart John L. Reid, and Don Neal, in Their Individual Capacities

Opinion

64 F.3d 658

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Nathaniel MORGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
George PADGETT, Betty Cummings, Donald R. Mctaggart, John L.
Reid, and Don Neal, in their individual
capacities, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6859.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 27, 1995.
Decided Aug. 22, 1995.

Nathaniel Morgan, Appellant Pro Se.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Morgan v. Padgett, No. CA-95-1122-3-19BC (D.S.C. May 11, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.