U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

United States v. James A. Butler, A/K/A Willie James Butler, A/K/A John Thomas, A/K/A Grady

United States v. James A. Butler, A/K/A Willie James Butler, A/K/A John Thomas, A/K/A Grady
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 16, 1995
64 F.3d 659; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 29973; 1995 WL 487349 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. James A. Butler, A/K/A Willie James Butler, A/K/A John Thomas, A/K/A Grady

Opinion

64 F.3d 659

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
James A. BUTLER, a/k/a Willie James Butler, a/k/a John
Thomas, a/k/a Grady, Defendant--Appellant.

No. 95-5249.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 27, 1995
Decided Aug. 16, 1995

James A. Butler, appellant Pro Se.

Howard Crawford Vick, Jr., Office of the U.S. Atty., Richmond, VA., for appellee.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e) motion for the return of property that was seized as part of a forfeiture. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Butler, No. CR-91-44 (E.D.Va. Mar. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.