U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

United States v. Hubert Hendricks, A/K/A Todd Hendricks, A/K/A Todd Williams

United States v. Hubert Hendricks, A/K/A Todd Hendricks, A/K/A Todd Williams
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 16, 1995
64 F.3d 660; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 30116; 1995 WL 487341 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. Hubert Hendricks, A/K/A Todd Hendricks, A/K/A Todd Williams

Opinion

64 F.3d 660

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Hubert HENDRICKS, a/k/a Todd Hendricks, a/k/a Todd Williams,
Defendant--Appellant.

No. 95-6135.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Aug. 16, 1995.

Hubert Hendricks, appellant pro se.

Laura Marie Everhart, Asst. U.S. Atty., Norfolk, VA, for appellee.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hendricks, Nos. CR-92-163-N; CA-94-1186-2 (E.D.Va. Jan. 10, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.