United States v. Anthony Grandison
United States v. Anthony Grandison
Opinion
64 F.3d 660
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Anthony GRANDISON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 95-6815.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 25, 1995.
Decided Aug. 14, 1995.
Anthony Grandison, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD, for Appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying Appellant's request for copies of certain exhibits introduced at Appellant's 1983 trial. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Grandison, No. CR-82-501-JH (D.Md. Apr. 25, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.