United States v. Ramos Antonio Altagracia Tejada-Reynoso
United States v. Ramos Antonio Altagracia Tejada-Reynoso
Opinion
64 F.3d 661
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ramos Antonio Altagracia TEJADA-REYNOSO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 95-6901.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 25, 1995.
Decided Aug. 15, 1995.
Ramos Antonio Altagracia Tejada-Reynoso, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, VA, for Appellee.
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to modify his sentence in which he sought retroactive application of 18 U.S.C.A. Sec. 3553(f) (West Supp. 1995). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Tejada-Reynoso, No. CR-90-112-R(L) (W.D.Va. May 26, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.