U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

William Flythe v. (Unknown) Faulk, Captain John Doe John Doe Sheriff, Suffolk County, Virginia Sheriff's Department D.J. Knight James Minard

William Flythe v. (Unknown) Faulk, Captain John Doe John Doe Sheriff, Suffolk County, Virginia Sheriff's Department D.J. Knight James Minard
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 18, 1995
66 F.3d 315; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 33546; 1995 WL 551335 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

William Flythe v. (Unknown) Faulk, Captain John Doe John Doe Sheriff, Suffolk County, Virginia Sheriff's Department D.J. Knight James Minard

Opinion

66 F.3d 315

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William FLYTHE, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
(Unknown) FAULK, Captain; John Doe; John Doe; Sheriff,
Suffolk County, Virginia; Sheriff's Department;
D.J. Knight; James Minard, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6899.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 24, 1995.
Decided: Sept. 18, 1995.

William Flythe, appellant pro se. Jeff Wayne Rosen, David Ian Tenzer, Adler, Rosen & Peters, P.C., Virginia Beach, VA, for appellees.

Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Flythe v. Faulk, No. CA-94-808 (E.D.Va. May 30, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.