Jason Victor Hamm-Bey v. Margaret Chippendale Correctional Officer Hull-Rice, in Their Individual and Official Capacities
Jason Victor Hamm-Bey v. Margaret Chippendale Correctional Officer Hull-Rice, in Their Individual and Official Capacities
Opinion
66 F.3d 315
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jason Victor HAMM-BEY, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Margaret CHIPPENDALE; Correctional Officer Hull-Rice, In
their individual and official capacities,
Defendants--Appellees.
No. 95-7018.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 24, 1995.
Decided: Sept. 19, 1995.
Jason Victor Hamm-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Amy Kushner Kline, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hamm-Bey v. Chippendale, No. CA-95-296 (D. Md. June 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.