Haynes v. Huffman
Haynes v. Huffman
Opinion
66 F.3d 316
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ricky D. HAYNES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Larry HUFFMAN, Regional Administrator; James B. Taylor,
Warden; Lieutenant Cottrell, Investigator; J. Woodson,
Captain; A. Giles, Corrections Officer; R.K. White,
Hearings Officer; C.A. Foster, Corrections Officer; D.
Lovejoy, Inmate; S. Jones, Major, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-6703.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Sept. 14, 1995.
Ricky D. Haynes, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint upon recommendation of the magistrate judge. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.