U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

James T. Miller v. Doctor Ibarra Doctor Habeeb F. Clark, Rn L. Chambless, Rn E. Cochran, Rn Doctor Hipol P. Edge, Warden St. B.C.C.

James T. Miller v. Doctor Ibarra Doctor Habeeb F. Clark, Rn L. Chambless, Rn E. Cochran, Rn Doctor Hipol P. Edge, Warden St. B.C.C.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 14, 1995
66 F.3d 316; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 33604; 1995 WL 543473 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

James T. Miller v. Doctor Ibarra Doctor Habeeb F. Clark, Rn L. Chambless, Rn E. Cochran, Rn Doctor Hipol P. Edge, Warden St. B.C.C.

Opinion

66 F.3d 316

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James T. MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Doctor IBARRA; Doctor Habeeb; F. Clark, RN; L. Chambless,
RN; E. Cochran, RN; Doctor Hipol; P. Edge,
Warden St. B.C.C., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6686.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Sept. 14, 1995.

James T. Miller, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Miller v. Ibarra, No. CA-94-1465-AM (E.D.Va. Apr. 3, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.