Gary Perry v. Pat Chavis Emilio Pagan
Gary Perry v. Pat Chavis Emilio Pagan
Opinion
66 F.3d 316
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Gary PERRY, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Pat CHAVIS; Emilio Pagan, Defendants--Appellees.
No. 95-7001.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 24, 1995.
Decided Sept. 19, 1995.
Gary Perry, appellant pro se.
Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Perry v. Chavis, No. CA-95-520-5 (E.D.N.C. June 23, 1995). Further, we deny Appellant's motion for oral argument and dispense with argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.