Starks v. Bullard
Starks v. Bullard
Opinion
66 F.3d 317
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ronald STARKS, a/k/a Zee Zee Ze La Zurro, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Allen BULLARD, Chief of Records at Department of
Corrections; C.J. Cepak, Warden, Broad River
Correctional Institution; Parker Evatt,
Director, Department of Corrections,
Defendants--Appellees.
No. 95-6900.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 24, 1995.
Decided: Sept. 18, 1995.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-94-2830-3-8BD)
Ronald Starks, appellant pro se. Ernest Crosby Lewis, Belser, Lewis & Rogers, P.A., Columbia, SC, for appellees.
Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Starks v. Bullard, No. CA-94-2830-3-8BD (D.S.C. May 25, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.