U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

United States v. Eric M. Freedlander

United States v. Eric M. Freedlander
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 15, 1995
66 F.3d 317; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 33632; 1995 WL 550549 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. Eric M. Freedlander

Opinion

66 F.3d 317

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Eric M. FREEDLANDER, Defendant--Appellant.

No. 95-6822.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Sept. 15, 1995.

Eric M. Freedlander, appellant pro se.

David R. Maguire, Asst. U.S Atty., Richmond, VA, for appellee.

Before WIDENER, HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Freedlander, Nos. CR-91-18 & CA-95-114 (E.D.Va. May 16, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.