U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

Anthony Atkins v. B. Brereton, Counselor Counselor Walus Larry Huffman

Anthony Atkins v. B. Brereton, Counselor Counselor Walus Larry Huffman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 4, 1995
67 F.3d 293; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 32469; 1995 WL 580936 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Anthony Atkins v. B. Brereton, Counselor Counselor Walus Larry Huffman

Opinion

67 F.3d 293

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Anthony ATKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
B. BRERETON, Counselor; Counselor Walus; Larry Huffman,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6911.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 21, 1995.
Decided Oct. 4, 1995.

Anthony Atkins, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Atkins v. Brereton, No. CA-94-225-R (W.D.Va. June 5, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.