U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

Anthony Atkins v. E.D. Carey, Md S.M. Murphy, Rn

Anthony Atkins v. E.D. Carey, Md S.M. Murphy, Rn
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 4, 1995
67 F.3d 293; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 32468; 1995 WL 580932 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Anthony Atkins v. E.D. Carey, Md S.M. Murphy, Rn

Opinion

67 F.3d 293

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Anthony ATKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
E.D. CAREY, MD; S.M. Murphy, RN, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6927.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 21, 1995.
Decided Oct. 4, 1995.

Anthony Atkins, Appellant Pro Se. Colin James Steuart Thomas, Jr., TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, P.C., Staunton, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Atkins v. Carey, No. CA-94-178-R (W.D.Va. June 5, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.