James C. Bartley v. Clinchfield Coal Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
James C. Bartley v. Clinchfield Coal Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
Opinion
67 F.3d 293
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James C. BARTLEY, Petitioner,
v.
CLINCHFIELD COAL COMPANY; Director, Office of Workers'
Compensation Programs, United States Department of
Labor, Respondents.
No. 95-1824.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 29, 1995.
Decided Sept. 21, 1995.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (94-144-BLA)
James C. Bartley, Petitioner Pro Se. Harry Ashby Dickerson, PENN, STUART, ESKRIDGE & JONES, Abingdon, Virginia; Rita A. Roppolo, Christian P. Barber, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
Ben.Rev.Bd.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. Secs. 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1993). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Bartley v. Clinchfield Coal Co., No. 94-144-BLA (B.R.B. Mar. 27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.