Wonis Rafae Davis v. Randall Lee William Shockley Dale Stephens
Wonis Rafae Davis v. Randall Lee William Shockley Dale Stephens
Opinion
67 F.3d 294
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Wonis Rafae DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Randall LEE; William Shockley; Dale Stephens, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-6993.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 21, 1995.
Decided Oct. 4, 1995.
Wonis Rafae Davis, Appellant Pro Se.
Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Davis v. Lee, No. CA-94-917-5-CT-H (E.D.N.C. June 6, 1995). We also deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.